I’ve been following the HIV dissident movement for nearly a decade now… Years ago I used to whittle away hours in the BMJ’s “quick response” section, but it was just a bunch of arguing… no one managed to convince anyone else, and it felt masturbatory, so I found other endeavours. ;)
I checked that link, and this stood out;
“Prof Gallo, who was one of the scientists who discovered AIDS in the early 1980s and linked HIV as the cause of the disease, testified via video-link from his home in Bethesda, Massachusetts.”
Which amazes me, because it means that the case was easily biased from the very beginning. Of course the “discoverer” would have plenty of motivation to lie and defend what he claims to have “discovered”. I’d like to know why independent verification of HIV’s alleged “existence” is so lacking, and why is it that in so many cases of where HIV is alleged to have been found, there is no evidence of AIDS, and also the opposite where AIDS is alleged to be the disease but no HIV is found.
These facts destroy the credibility of AIDS as a real disease long before we get into the problem that there’s virtually no international agreement on what the symptoms are, that can’t be explained as so many other things. It looks like a huge rort.