With the GOP presidential sweepstakes over, the antiwar voter – that is, the single-issue voter who conditions his support on the candidate’s generally pro-peace foreign policy stance – was left with a single choice, and that is Obama.
Not true, says Thomas L. Knapp:
Obama ran for US Senate partially on his opposition to the war. Since being elected, he’s voted for continued funding of the war every time it has come up. Now he’s running for president partially on his opposition to the war. Who the hell would trust him on that a second time?
Not only is
Osama Obama pro-war, despite his rhetoric, he is also one of the 10 most corrupt politicians in America:
A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.
Anyone dumb enough to believe the Rev. Osama-bama‘s lies gets a thumbs down in my book. This Justin Raimondo fan is a fan no more.