Archive for the ‘nanny state’ Category
Marc Stevens writes:
It’s truly amazing despite all the crimes committed by governments, people still religiously cling to the idea governments are necessary to protect life, liberty and property. You can even point out governments not only have no duty to protect anyone, but also do a disasterous job at whatever they bother doing. Despite overwhelming evidence government is not only unnecessary, corrupt and a cancer on the world, its victims continue to revere them. Maybe this will help convince them governments are nothing more than gangs of killers, thieves and liars.
I disagree about them doing a disastrous job. Government actually does its job exceptionally well – which is to rob, rape, murder and plunder its subjects while doing everything in its power to expand and protect its monopoly on violence.
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, mainstream media, nanny state, politics, tagged brainwash, conform, consume, John Carpenter, obey, propaganda, submit, They Live, watch tv on June 3, 2010 | 3 Comments »
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, government regulation, ideology, libertarian, nanny state, politics, Republicans, US Constitution, video, tagged Civil Rights Act, discrimination, freedom, racism, Rand Paul on May 31, 2010 | 2 Comments »
When Rand Paul suggested the 1964 Civil Rights Act went too far, he was widely criticized by Democrats and Republicans alike. Here, Professor Williams explains why they are wrong and Rand is right, while making a far more important point about liberty itself.
Oil seeps are fairly common around the world both underwater and aboveground. Oil seeps occur when enough cracks and fissures form above a reservoir to enable a small quantity of oil to escape naturally. The La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles (pictured below) are a large terrestrial oil seep, and oil seeps have long been used to help identify submarine oil reserves. Oil seeps are prevalent in many bodies of water, and the Gulf of Mexico is no exception.
Oil seeps are more common than you think, both on land and underwater.
A satellite survey published in January of 2000 counted at least 600 natural oil seeps within the Gulf. And they release a lot of oil.
A 2003 National Academies study estimated that about 980,000 barrels of oil, or about 41 million gallons, seep into the Gulf – every year. Recall that the Exxon Valdez is estimated to have spilled about 250,000 barrels.
So approximately four Exxon Valdezes naturally seep into the Gulf each year. The hysteria manufactured over the recent spill, or anything else for that matter, is designed to provide an excuse for more government intervention.
As Lew Rockwell points out: “Oil is natural, organic, and biodegradable”.
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, government regulation, hysteria, ideology, mainstream media, nanny state, politics, US Constitution, tagged Civil Rights Act, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, racism, Rand Paul, reading list on May 27, 2010 | 7 Comments »
Rachel, here’s a reading list for you. Please educate yourself to avoid making a complete fool out of yourself on national television.
- ‘Hornberger,’ the Video (You don’t even have to read this one)
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, ideology, libertarian, nanny state, politics, US Constitution, tagged Civil Rights Act, discrimination, Rachel Maddow, racism, Rand Paul on May 25, 2010 | 3 Comments »
David Kramer writes:
A racist White store owner cannot legally prevent a Black customer from trading with him. Yet, a racist White customer can legally prevent a Black store owner from trading with him by just not walking into his or her store. So what’s the difference? In both cases, one of the two parties (i.e., the Black person) in the trade is being economically “hurt” by the other party (i.e., the racist White person).
Not to mention the Civil Rights Act only “protects” a limited group of minorities. What about the others?
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, government regulation, ideology, libertarian, nanny state, politics, US Constitution, tagged Civil Rights Act, discrimination, Rachel Maddow, racism, Rand Paul on May 25, 2010 | 4 Comments »
Thomas DiLorenzo asks:
Why do you think say, a Jewish restaurant owner, should be forced by the governent to serve a neo-Nazi wearing a swastika armband, who just finished marching in a “Hitler Was Right” parade down mainstreat (legally protected by your buds at the ACLU, of course)? Shouldn’t he be free to just say “Get the hell off of my property, you scumbag”? Do you really think that forcing him to serve the Nazi, as the Civil Rights Act would do if enforced, is conducive to freedom? What would give the Nazi a “civil right” to agitate and hector the Jewish restaurant owner in this way?
The Civil Rights Act is anti-freedom.
Posted in abuse of power/corruption, government regulation, hysteria, ideology, libertarian, nanny state, politics, US Constitution, video, tagged Civil Rights Act, Rachel Maddow, racism, Rand Paul on May 24, 2010 | 1 Comment »