David Kramer writes:
A racist White store owner cannot legally prevent a Black customer from trading with him. Yet, a racist White customer can legally prevent a Black store owner from trading with him by just not walking into his or her store. So what’s the difference? In both cases, one of the two parties (i.e., the Black person) in the trade is being economically “hurt” by the other party (i.e., the racist White person).
Not to mention the Civil Rights Act only “protects” a limited group of minorities. What about the others?
So in other words, it should be legal for a racist black doctor with a private paractice to refuse treatment to whites and vice versa–even in the case of emergencies of life & death?…
No thanks, I don’t buy into your Liberatarian BS.
Umm, why would anyone go to a hospital that does that kind of thing? Most people wouldn’t. I take it you don’t own a business, money is money no matter who it comes from.
*private practice* i should really spellcheck